
If you have a common name, you can narrow down your search results by specifying the city and/or state where you have lived.If you are a business owner, you may also file on behalf of your business. You can search for anyone, but you may only file a claim for property that belongs to you or for which you are the legal heir.The business search requires entering your business name.

#Wheres mymoney full#
An individual search is based upon your last name (current or prior name) and your full or partial first name. A family search only requires a last name. You can search for an individual, family member or business.Tips for searchingįor specific advice, see the search tips on the website. Click the letter U, and then click Unclaimed Assets, FAQ. On the site, click A to Z Index on the left-hand navigation bar. Department of the Treasury has a Financial Management Service website that provides information about unclaimed federal assets. If your search state isn’t listed on, follow the instructions for contacting that state’s unclaimed property office. Follow the instructions for requesting a claim form on the website. There is no cost to search for your property or to request a claim form. The website is authorized by New Mexico and other states to list owners of unclaimed property. įor specific eligibility requirements and site links, see Filing a Claim. To search for unclaimed property in New Mexico visit. Until the money is claimed, it is used by the State’s General Funds, serving the citizens and taxpayers of the State of New Mexico. If you can prove you are entitled to the money, we will gladly return it to you, at any time, without charge. The Unclaimed Property Unit serves as custodian of this money. These accounts are known as “lost,” “abandoned,” or “unclaimed” funds. "We'll show the court how our advertising products benefit publishers and help them fund their content online," Taylor said.For your protection, banks, insurance companies, utilities, investment companies and many other businesses are required by State law to surrender inactive accounts to the State. Taylor also told us that publishers using Google ad tools keep the vast majority of their revenue.

Gannett has also demanded damages and more from Google.ĭan Taylor, VP of Google Ads, told The Register Gannett's claims are "simply wrong" because publishers have a variety of advertising tech options, several of which Taylor said Gannett makes use of. What that could mean outside of an Ad Manager split is unclear. That said, the seven-count case, which includes five charges of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act along with common law fraud and violations of New York business law, does ask the court to enjoin Google from continuing to violate the Sherman Act. We'll show the court how our advertising products benefit publishers While Europe, the US federal government, and some states have called for Google to be forced to sell its Ad Manager suite, which includes DoubleClick and AdX, Gannett stops short of calling for the company's breakup in its request for a jury trial. Google has also been accused by Uncle Sam of destroying evidence in a federal case against Alphabet's ad arm. Welcome to the Google ad tech litigation clubĪs noted above, Gannett is just the latest link in a growing chain of lawsuits accusing Google of abusing its ad tech dominance, most of which make the same basic allegations, namely that "Google controls both sides of the adtech market: sell and buy," and that "it may have abused its dominance to favor its own AdX platform," as articulated by EU Commissioner for competition Margrethe Vestager. Gannett also called Google out for earning money on the backs of publishers by reusing content without passing along ad revenue, something the Canadian government has taken notice of, too. How it does that, as alleged, is likely familiar to anyone who has read up on Google's advertising practices: the Chrome titan owns the dominant publisher ad server, DoubleClick for Publishers, and the dominant ad exchange, DoubleClick Ad Exchange (AdX), and uses the pair to "defeat competition among exchanges and drive down prices for publishers' inventory," the Gannett suit alleged.
